Consider yourself lucky, I got a MASSIVE fuckin migraine that STILL won't let up...uuuggghh... took way, way too many Tylenol and it still won't go away...time to break out the "big guns" (pain killers).
Mmmm, I can only speak for myself by the by, but everything I deleted was blatant sick fuckery...as in CHILD genitalia. I didn't bother with the "softcore" wannabe child porn, only the incredibly overly obvious shit. I also generally don't give a fuck about pseudo-teens that are 16 years old or what-the-fuck ever, cause that's legal in most places on the planet (including many US states) and the majority of those all have adult level genitalia anyway (at least the drawn shit does). I also generally don't give a fuck about "shock art" shit, stuff specifically designed/used to warp a person's reality with material that even "normal" pedophiles couldn't get off on (like babyfuck). What concerns me is when "Rule34" in general is used as a really PISS POOR EXCUSE to put up a pedo-porn gallery and plaster it all over the fuckin article. "Rule34" in general is supposed to be SHOCK ART style, meaning the more shocking and the harder it is for ~anyone~ to masturbate too the "better" it is. And generally speaking any article should only have *ONE* example, ie "the best of the best" in the shock/sick fuckery. Unless there's just a whole SLEW of REALLY GOOD shock art style stuffs. Like the My Little Pony article for example, it's got a HUGE album of "Rule34" style shock art, but all of it is so the fuck over the line of sanity that no brony in his right mind could ~possibly~ ever fap to it (and if they could I'd probably give them a damn medal for it).
I delete anything that depicts a child sexualized, as defined by law. If you're interested in obtaining the .com domain by legal means, I'd suggest throwing your personal feelings on the issue out the window. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2256#2_B (iii) graphic or simulated lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person; The way I see it people are just looking for an excuse to spam loli shit on the wiki the same way furfags and bronys look for an excuse to spit their shit all over the internet as well. It doesn't add anything to the articles. The only thing I regret deleting are the wikitan edit war pictures, because they hold historical significance. I intend to reverse that when I get some free time.
"I thought you were cool..." ...but now it turns out you're a PEDOPHILE?! LOLWUT Seriously, how many more times in the next week do you think you're going to use that lame ass line on people before you figure out that the problem is a present short between YOUR keyboard and chair. Oh but don't worry, there's still some softcore CHILD PORN for you fap off on you sick fuck... https://encyclopediadramatica.es/File:Pokemonhentai81.png https://encyclopediadramatica.es/File:MistyAss.png https://encyclopediadramatica.es/File:Pokeboy.jpg https://encyclopediadramatica.es/File:Pokemonhentai34.jpg https://encyclopediadramatica.es/File:Lolis.gif Of course I believe you're a furfag so why don't you just use your ~imagination~ fuckwit and fap off to this shit... https://encyclopediadramatica.es/Gardevoir
Going by "the law" is not really a good idea in general. I mean...whose "laws" are we talking about? I mean if you want to go by RUSSIAN law technically naked fucking TWELVE YEAR OLDS is "legal". Also given that ED isn't hosted in the US any US law by default is a rather moot point for the most part. I don't give a fuck about "the law" I give a fuck about screwing the fuck up PEDOPHILES, about making their lives as miserable and inconvenient as I possibly can...I generally don't give a rats fucking ass about ANYTHING besides that.
The law that applies is wherever the servers are physically located, not which domain it's being routed through. The only legal bearing Spain has on us is the ability to cancel the domain. Also, the person who is at risk is the person who owns the servers. So far the sake of avoiding headaches, I'll care for you.
Ahhh...no. LOL No, no, no, no...that perception is going to get your ass burned in so many different directions. On the SUPERFICIAL level it may be about where the content is hosted, but you need to be wise about EXTRADITION LAWS and who has ties with who. That's what got Fat Ass, the owner of that file hosting/sharing site in trouble. Dumbfuck thought he couldn't be touched because his servers weren't in the US...that was until the country hosting his shit decided to extradite his dumbass to the US in exchange for political points. "The law" in general, in many areas, is *GRAY*...it's not "black and white" and you need to be *VERY* careful about how you "play" in general. You also need to keep in mind that "the law" often doesn't matter to those who want to "get back" at you for one reason or another. Just look at my original server, it was hammered with a DDoS attack so gawd damn massive that the FBI took interest and it knocked out an entire DATA CENTER in the process. When people can't touch you on the LEGAL level they WILL resort to the ILLEGAL level to try and do so. "The law" in relation to me is, honestly, a fucking joke, I can manipulate and control "the law" in pretty much any manner I like and have a long history of doing just that. I'm more concerned with ILLEGAL means of retribution, which is the level that the majority of my little frothing haters are on.
I don't see how that refutes the point I made or makes it any less valid. This has nothing to do with your haters, or a butthurt skid trying to DDoS cloudflare. This is about illegal content on ED's servers.
There IS NO "illegal" content on ED's servers...period. The decision to remove child porn is a PERSONAL one, it has nothing to do with ANY law whatsoever. Go ask Zaiger if you like, he's the one who said just that, I'm merely repeating it. Given where ED is hosted and the present political air between involved countries there's no "legal" anything about it. Again, it's a PERSONAL DECISION, one that Zaiger has made and most of us, like myself, generally approve of. It's not about "the law" it's a MORAL DECISION not to openly enable pedophiles or to allow them to use the site as a means of promoting their sordid, nasty fucking "culture".
No, they're not. As the site is satirical/parody based, every single thing uploaded into it is effectively defined by that general purpose/goal. ...including any pictures of naked children. Again, primarily as "shock art". We CHOOSE not to allow "shock art" that can be directly utilized as general fap fodder for pedophiles...that's a MORAL CHOICE, it has nothing to do with any law. That's why Sherrod never got busted for breaking any child porn laws, because it didn't tha'fawk matter. As I said before, it's like taking nudie pictures of your kids and uploading them to your FB page for friends and family, IN THAT CONTEXT they're not child porn, however the minute you take those EXACT SAME PICTURES and upload them onto a known pedophile board/site then IN THAT CONTEXT they become child pornography. ED is not a child porn/pedo oriented site, as such, any such material uploaded to it cannot be directly construed as having such CONTEXT. You really, REALLY don't understand child porn laws (for as much as you like to post links to them). As I mentioned before they're largely GRAY LAWS and depend on a VARIETY OF CIRCUMSTANCES, none of which ED presently meets. If we did we could likewise be nailed for slander, libel, defamation and the like.
I'm afraid it's you who does not understand the law. If we are made aware of the pictures, we are legally required to remove them. Failure to do so would be incriminating. You cannot claim "satire" or "parody" on child pornography because obscenity laws override that. If Daniel Brandt was a law enforcement entity, then you might have a point.
Yep As SWFan doesn't give a fuck about anything besides molesting furries... At last, some sincerity on the subject! Tnx, dude. Of course, that makes you (in plural) exactly as despicable as all the others who think they can, and must, enforce their moral stance and preferences over errybody For me, ANY kind of censorship on ED is lame, absurd, hypocrite, incongruent and ALWAYS makes the wiki worse, never better. ANY. But that's just me...
Hi, plural entity here. If I were doing this on a moral stance I wouldn't have left legal imagery intact. Go ahead and browse the articles I removed images from, there's plenty of shit on there I find disgusting and morally objectionable. But please, feel free to assume I'm only concerned in running a vigilante campaign against pedophiles and not taking steps to secure the longevity of this community and deter legal harassment on behalf of the owners.