Since Doug Walker just ended Nostalgia Critic, TGWTG probably is going to lose half its viewers and possibly go defunct and speaking of Andrew Dickman, http://andrewdickman.deviantart.com/gallery/?q=realistic#/dowwaq basically bawwing about how cartoons are becoming too realistic cause you know, if a cartoon has a defined story line, an art style that doesn't rely on the eyes being bigger then the mouth and fart jokes, then its too realistic and unfunny for my manchild self
Did I ever make that claim in my previous message? No. I said that I observed higher quality fanart. While the pony fanbase is particularly strong in some areas, in other ways, it's worse than any fandom out there. And yet, many of these MLP artists can draw pretty damn fine.
Okay, yes, I too sometimes get nostalgic about old cartoons, but fuck. That's the thing about them, you can't just bring them back, they'll suck. Say Bugs Bunny came back (the old slapstick shit, not this... weird sitcom type thing... or whatever) It would probably just be rehashings of the same "episodes" (if you don't already consider half the episodes just the same schtick) And holy shit when did he stop Nostalgia Critic? I wish I had heard that earlier. Maybe the circlejerking on that site will finally end Nope, probably not.
I actually liked the Discord video, but I have friends in weird places. There's a ton of girls at the college I go to who constantly draw yaoi, especially Supernatural and Sherlock yaoi. They draw very well but you can tell a lot of it is poses they remember from comics. Also that weird yaoi huge hand thing.
Pretty much this. Also, notice how this thread is called "Wasted Talent" instead of "Let's talk about our fandoms." It's weird, I know.
You know, every time I some grown ass dude crying about how old cartoons were so much better back then and how much today's cartoons suck, I'm always reminded of this scene from the Twilight Zone episode called Walking Distance: They're so clouded by their nostalgia that they can't seem to just stop and look. If they did, they might realize that cartoons are just fine now. I mean, yeah, there's tons of crap. But there's always been crap. Quite frankly, the 90's were fucking full of shitty cartoons. Anyone remember Road Rovers? or Biker Mice From Mars? or Bucky O'Hare? Oh wait, you don't. Probably because they sucked. The 80's were full of them too, and so were the 70's (oh god) and so on. I know this probably sounds really gay and all, but it's just something that's been on my mind for a while. Ok, now let's get this goddamn thread back on track.
In a way I see where he's coming from, a lot of lazy animation with flash which is kinda shitty and all and bland stick figure like shows like 40z Mouse or some shit, and south park, adventure time, etc. They all look like they were drawn from some 14 year old compared to some of the cartoons from back in the day. That being said though, a lot of shows from the 80s sucked dick in animation, and some of the 90s shows were just retarded in plot or ripoffs of the Ninja Turtles or some shit. I mean, animation of Korra, compared to other shows, it far superior, but it's an exception to the rule. Some of the shit on tv nowadays seems like a fucking joke. I don't remember road rovers but from a quick google search and seeing a lot of over-grown dog tits I'd say that it's better if I didn't.
Crooked Trees Followed this guy since he started. Left when he started doing this: On his dead blog he wrote these OHMYGOD GUYS I AM SUCH A REBEL FROM SOCIETY BY PAINTING HORSES FUCING! Anddddd he just admitted he was a pedophile.
Not that it wasn't already obvious, what with the porn of child characters from a children's show being beaten and ra ped
Wow... what a douche. It always makes me laugh how all those assholes try to come up with overblown ideologies and similar crap, in order to justify the fact that they're a bunch of sickfucks who love fapping to underage cartoon horses. Also, this guy's style reminds me very much of Pig Fish - a guy who's clearly has potential, but prefers to waste it on drawing shit artwork of underage cartoon ponies getting fucked and all the other "dark and edgy" bullcrap.
AKA the pablum spewed out by every person ever featured in the fetish thread when called out on their bullshit What is it about cartoon porn that makes these fucks so uppity NOOOOO YOU'RE ATTACKING MY RIGHT TO JERK OFF TO LITTLE GIRLS BEING MOLESTED/EATEN ALIVE/TURNED INTO STATUES/WHATEVER THE FUCK ELSE THERE'S FIVE DIFFERENT GROUPS FOR ON DA Fucking, why is it always ponies, why is it always the child characters, and why is it always violent and/or nonconsensual
Yes, these bunch of pedophiles are so dark, edgy and original when copying off each others shitty fap fodder ideas of abused, underage equine. Truly, their talents are not wasted on child rape porn because that is such a highly sought goal for an artist. Above all it is "fanart" of a children's cartoon that people above the age of 12 (stretching it) and male genitalia should not even be watching, which makes it that much more edgyyyyy. I'm sorry, but if you're going to make terrible "fanart" of something, wouldn't you want to be able to say the creators of the show could even stand to look at it? Because from what I've heard they're not exactly pleased with the fanbase, but whatever, bottom line; draw your shitty art, but don't be surprised when people call you a pedophile horsefucker for it. What's worse is I got a heavy indication that he takes pride in his child abuse pony porn. (No shit, right?)
i wasn't aware drawing porn and rape scenes made people feel like an unabashed kid again. well, okay, if that's how it is these days....
pan·der noun Also, pan·der·er. 1.a person who furnishes clients for a prostitute or supplies persons for illicit sexual intercourse; procurer; pimp. 2.a person who caters to or profits from the weaknesses or vices of others. 3.a go-between in amorous intrigues. verb(usedwithoutobject) 4.to act as a pander; cater basely: to pander to the vile tastesof vulgar persons. So...yeah, "pandering" at its most basic means to cater to a small group, not the mainstream.