...governments have done in recent years is shift the debates from economic liberties to social liberties. Economic liberty is a bread and butter issue. Social liberty, while necessary, is utterly irrelevant when one doesn't have economic liberty. Not only that but all of these debates add legitimacy to the idea of government. The debates are all centred around whether the government should allow us to have any sort of liberties. We're conforming to the government, instead of the other way around.
The religious debates are a good one. Recently you had Americans and pseudo-Europeans flipping their shit for no discernible reason over homosexuals not being allowed to propagate children in Russia. (For some reason it's okay to call Russians barbarians for that but not okay to call Muslims or Africans or Asians that for making homosexuality a capital offence.) There's a ruckus about gun control every time there's a shooting in America, which is practically every two months. Etc. In both Britain and America the government leased orphans (as well as forcing individuals in general) to work for industrialists in order to rapidly industrialise their nations. How in the fuck is that freedom?
Fucking this. the sheer hypocrisy gets right on my tits. muslims and all the rest are barbarians by any definition of the word yet we must "embrace their cultural differences" even if their cultural differences involve brutally hacking each other to death for no clear reason, but god forbid that russia should decide that letting gays adopt children is bad, because thats far worse than allowing suicide bombers and murderers to proliferate, right guys?
under occupation on my profile you'll note it says "failed communist" but seriously, I am probably the worst communist this side of anywhere. frankly I don't know why I don't just change that hammer and sickle to a swastika and have done with it.
Liberty, dude. And yes. I mean... if you want shit like prosperity, equality, rapid technology advancement and so on. If a leader can direct Humanity's lust for power towards more constructive goals like economic competition then we will enter a golden age for our entire species. If.
No, we need mass acceptance of homosexuality as the only way of life. Human suffering will only end when all men exclusively fuck each other in the ass, due to a forseen nonexistent future birthrate. If we can't achieve this through mass persuasion, then all future children will be confiscated by government to be raised as homosexuals.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I thought laws were made to fix problems we see with certain human behavior. I really don't see how banging another man in the pooper hurts people or causes problems. Sure, it weird. That's about it. It's like were trying to fix a problem that doesn't exist.
banging a man in the pooper makes God unhappy, and He causes problems for everyone. If we prevent man from banging man, it keeps God out of our hair and society won't fall apart.
thus spoke gay jesus, son of the lord of homosexuality and part of the holy trinity of queerness of lord fag the father, gay jesus the son and the holy ghost of cum up his ass