This is why you shouldn't do drugs kids, right here. Next time say "you don't want to be like Chris Hart do you? Don't be a crackhead." Also, since when do women's breasts have muscle like that unless they're taking steroids or maybe anorexic.. I mean seriously, if that is proof of anything it's that he doesn't know proper female anatomy let that picture be it. He doesn't even fucking draw her nipples, women have nipples you know despite how "dirty" and "naughty" it may be. I mean look at this God, what a shitty artist. It's people like him who are the real reason for the death in the manga industry, douchebags who cash out to sell the literal shit that is their art. He doesn't even know the basics and I should be learning to draw from him? Pathetic. However let's look at more drawings: Her spine isn't even in the right place... Fuck you you dick, what kind of asshat puts a review up as a deviation? Oh yeah, that's right. Christopher Hart.
Guys, I've figured it out Christopher Hart is actually the greatest long-form troll, seeing just how much money and fame a gimmick he managed to stumble across years ago is going to net him There's really no other explanation for just how terrible he is because I refuse to believe a person can actually seriously be that fucking retarded
More energetic composition by putting a ton of static objects in the background? Fuck this guy. If you want to illustrate an action ( in this case the kids kissing ) you wouldn't hide that action by putting unnecessary clutter in the background. Also no Z-Composition... my eye is always leading to the left thanks to the older girls lips and the teddy bear with the murder stare.
Chris Hart's ass should be shot for saying this. It's teaching the wrong kind of shit to kids. It's like Preston hand-waving inconsistencies and errors in his drawing with "It's just a cartoon"
Those two would probably fall in love if they ever end up meeting one another. Imagine what they're children would be like?? Biggest douches in the world!
Hey, that's the guy responsible for Cartoon Cool! That book taught me a shitload of bad habits about UPA-esque animation (mostly confirming he was the kind of person who saw the superficial aspects of something like Dexter's Lab or Fairly OddParents and said to himself "I can do this shit" without understanding the background behind that art direction) and a lot of bad habits about drawing in general. You know you've fucked up when people have to consult John K to unlearn themselves. Like this for example. If you put a Greyscale filter on this you'd have light tones and dark tones and medium tones doing some great big drunken orgy. It does nothing to convey the focus of the scene. That and all the tangents, and the admittance to throwing perspective and construction to the wind because you're copying the superficial aspects of popular media, does absolutely no favors to the artist or the unfortunate audience - particularly if they're learning students who can't tell the difference between this and stuff like Fairly OddParents, or Symbionic Titan. Because it's all le retro, AMIRITE? ECKS DEE
I got reminded this post existed, so here's more stuff! I seriously thought this guy was a cross dresser the first time I seen this image.
The first picture looks like he sat a glass on the paper and it left a ring on the shirt. Omg, that second picture. This man has no business teaching people how to draw when he obviously has no skill whatsoever.
I remember when i was in my weeaboo phase i bought one of those shit books. I sucked pretty bad when i was like 9 but even then i could spot the suck coming out that book
.jpg)
