I concur. A good culling of, say...65% of the population would make ends meet a little better. WE NEED MORE PRODUCTIVITY. Weed out the obese, mentally inferior, and all the loafers that cruise along on government entitlements, and I'd say another golden age would be on the horizon.
I was referring to the parodying of "Reaganomics." Also, just tie the right to vote with paying income tax and, voila, no more (overtly) retarded nepotistic programs. You know, it's funny. There was (and is) a massive scare about "privatising" the police force yet Australia has been engaging in full-scale privatisation of everything (including security services) for over a decade now with only positive results. America, on the other hand, has given its thousand or so police force departments a blank cheque with increasingly negative results. Also, if you followed through on your initiative you'd have to kill a sizeable amount of veterans. Just saying.
We haven't privatized our police force over here, yet. Rather, our taxes are going into outfitting some police departments with tanks. No, not armored trucks...literally, TANKS. My initiative would be ambitious, yes, but don't let my label as "veteran" cause any confusion. In all honesty, I hold very little concern for my "fellow man". What's the old saying? "The needs of the many out-weigh the needs of the few" ? Something like that. Rather, I believe in the idea of acceptable losses...even better, the idea of making an example of those that resist. My own grandfather is supports the idea. In the 1960's, he was in Hungary while the Soviets were trying to take over. Rather than resist, he took advantage. He got himself the equivalent of a master's degree on the Soviet's dime and THEN started to push against them before being forced to flee. The Soviets held "demonstrations" in Budapest where the greased absolute SHITLOADS of resisting Hungarians...all while he sat by and watched with the veritable bucket of popcorn. "Not his problem", he said...smart man, my ole grandpa.
American bureaucrats are far too retarded to privatise anything properly. By giving the contract for the entire city to a single company you negate the benefits of privatisation. Indeed, all you've done is made streamlined tyranny and made it more efficient. Hm. My suggestion is to get a Grand Vizier. Also, I concur with your acceptable loses diatribe. It comes down to who-whom, though. It's against the law to send tribes protected by international law, like Magyars for instance, to areas surrounded by barbed wire and slowly starve them to death. However, it's not against the law to conscript them and use them as bullet fodder.
I am a bit confused. He wants to be treated as a woman, but doesn't want to go to the one place he could be sure to be treated as such? I guess I just don't understand fake female privilege.
This is false. Because of our technological advancements, there simply is no need for more workers. We have more than enough production capacity, more than enough product. Getting rid of over half our population would probably help with this, so that part is correct. We don't have an excess of lazy people per se, but rather a deficiency in useful work for those people to do. It's why we have so many government workers (and people lobbying for more constantly), which is really just welfare for people too proud for welfare.
Because nothing says rescue like 30,000 pounds of steel barreling through your fucking house at 45 mph.
He sounds like a narcissistic faggot, so it makes sense the spawn of his spawn derails a fluff thread about a tranny going to jail to post unrelated half-baked personal political philosophy.