NaokoElric2250; A true Femnazi in Denial

@oddguy look, we're actually teaching her something! She's growing up right before our very eyes!

^wishful thinking.

Yeah, you don't really get to say that, since you don't know how male puberty works.

Also I'm pretty sure you said this is how you normally talk in real life? So how many people on a daily basis walk away from you when you hit paragraph two?

Well, it's kind of a trial and error course. She shows small signs and then regresses immensely.

I'm disappointed that anyone would identify as either a feminist or a male rights activist at all. When you boil both of the arguments down and exclude all of the positive things that are typically covered by more inclusive concepts like egalitarianism, all that remains is plain old bigotry.

\my2cents

Have a translation. I speak fluent manchild from many years living with one.

No, no, girls is the correct address, as they are certainly not women. I am only afraid of flying, heights and fire. And again, not having/wanting sex because it is disgusting, natural or not, means I 'fear' it? Again, something else I expected to pop up sooner. Yeah, because nothing "I'm free!" like being a slave to primitive desires. Jesus Christ you things just cannot read or think properly can you?

Stupid thought of the day:
Food can be hard enough to be salty enough, but just a few grains of salt in a glass filled with water, will be absolutely horrendous. Even if you have salty food in your fat cakehole, while drinking.

I AM A WHORE FOR SALT!

i, too, am a whore for salt. sea-salt, rather, because table salt makes me gag and taste tin.
ech.

btw as a woman i love teh cockz. my boyfriend has a cock. i like playing with it. GO ME. SLAVE TO MEN AND ALL THAT I AM. i think this cunt is forgetting one thing: men will go to farther lengths (hurr hurr hurr) to get sex than women tend to do. meaning, spending cash to please a woman (whatever that means, be it going to fancy restaurants, buying a whore or buying appealing clothing/cars/etc), whereas most women just look pretty for it.
if anyone is a slave to primal instincts of fucking, it would be men. but, you know, calling someone a slave for wanting to fuck is goddamn retarded.

huge question, naoko. just a question. do you give a shit about anything that actually matters, or do you just give a shit about your stupid fucking delusions that the is mightier than the vag, and women are helpless creatures? i mean, do you care for shit like people getting paid shit wages for hard work, or no? anything beyond 'my gets wet and it's SCURRY'?

Key points made in this post: Rikku is afraid of heights, planes, and fire.

Here is a picture of a plane on fire in the sky.

I liked this post because it made laugh

So, you actually think you know enough about the nature of men and women to come to this harsh opinion?

Sorry to break this to you, but you are maybe 20something years old and not even a scientist on this matter.

Science, statistics and countless first hand experiences prove something else. But fuck it, your behavior is pathological, you need a therapy. No way you will ever consider something else than your crazy opinion to be the epitome of truth. Have fun in your imaginary, bleak world of rapists and those who resist them

You're a slave to fear, your metabolism and time.

Even though I've dragged my brain through the tl;dr textwalls of your retardation before, but okay then ;D

So you're telling me that I'm not heterosexual? Even though I know for a fact I only want to have sex with men?
Just because you don't have a sexuality, that doesn't mean all women don't. You =/= All women.
You know, that last sentence really is what all of this boils down to.
You keep trying to insist your personal views are the correct and only views.
That's arrogance at it's finest.

If you think having sex is only possible through an oath to promise ones body and soul to a man, then you should probably get your head out of the bible. I could go have sex with a guy tonight then go about my life like it never happened.

You clearly have no idea about other sex positions other than missionary. Which makes sense because you know shit about sex, let alone the positions involved.
Yeah, my boyfriend is penetrating me, but he isn't conquering me or dominating me because I'm not some helpless, weak idiot who allows it or equates sex to it, like yourself.
You seriously think it's impossible for women to get pleasure from sex?
What?
So..you don't know about orgasms?
You don't know about the sensitive receptors in the ?Oh right, because in your mind, even looking at your makes you a weakling.

Go ahead and give us some links and cited quotes to back your claim that you aren't the only delusional foreveralone idiot there is.

Says the idiot who equates men to lusty animals who can only rape.
Haha that's hilarious because my favorite position is Cow-girl. Speaking out of the asshole, as usual ;D
Even you don't understand your own writing as you keep contradicting yourself, which is understandable considering what little intelligence you had has been rotted away by your unwillingness to learn anything outside of your own opinion.

Funny, I never signed any papers legally handing over my body and my rights to my boyfriend. If anything, he's given his body to me. If he wants sex and I don't, sucks to be him. If I want sex, he's naked in 10 seconds flat. But you wouldn't know anything about the amount of control women have in sex because your life is dominated by the idea that men control you. How anti-feminist.
Yeah, I allow him to fuck me if '''I''' am in the mood, but if not? Then he'd better go find the lube.
It's my right to dictate what happens to my own body though. If your logic had any stand what-so-ever, then every woman who has ever married or had sex would literally be slaves to men, still.
Your logic dictates that a women who has had sex is an object, property to men when a true feminists ideals is that sex is liberation.
And so, you are in fact, not a feminist. Your ideals contradict the ideals of true feminists.

Nope. That's why contraceptives exist. If you knew anything about biology, which you don't, you'd know that sex is not just for reproduction. Sex serves as a way for two individuals to strengthen their relationship which is one reason why sex involves so much psychological aspects. If your logic had any legs to stand on, then sex would be a woman lying on her back and a man repeatedly thrusting until he came and the women would just get up and go about her way. No love, no kissing, no foreplay, no touching, no embracing.
But that's not what sex is. It can be, but when two people truly love each other, it's not just a man dumping his cum into her and they both go about their day.
It's not being hypocritical, it's factually how human beings are made. But you wouldn't know that.

The fact you cannot exert your opinion without calling anybody names just proves how immature and ignorant you actually are. A true strong, independent woman wouldn't need to rely on insults to get anywhere.
It's not saying he doesn't matter, it's saying that he's done the most minimal amount of work involved in creating offspring so he gets less say. If every time a man wanted a baby and the women didn't but, in your logic, the enslaved women didn't get to choose what to do with the offspring half of her went into and all of the following nine months of her life went into carrying and nourishing, then the world would be a lot more fucked than it is now. Of course a man would want to choose to keep the child, he generally doesn't have any idea what a woman goes through during pregnancy and birth.
All he did is orgasm into a women and sit by for the next nine months and through the birthing process doing whatever the fuck he wants.
So no, it's not misandric, it's feminsistic.

You used "God Forbid" incorrectly. Who the fuck said it's unmanly? LMAO see, I know when I've backed you into a corner when you start making that sort of shit up.

Because you did say you think men are pigs. In fact, you also said they are evil, raping, animalistic and lusty.

Who the hell, beside you, said it was? Making up shit again.
So does the , sweety, on top of the fluids the regularly creates and releases which is packed with bacteria it captured. How about you go back to the seventh grade and learn biology.

Aw, more name calling. It's okay, sweety. You don't need to be so enraged, it's okay to be mad when you are repeatedly proven to be an idiot.
And no lmao I believe woman can and do abuse and rape men. See, you're making assumptions again because it's all you really have.
And no.
Oh my rollerblading christ no.
Pay special attention to this because this is particularly hilarious to me.
You see, you assume I support the things you hate because I've correctly been against and debunked the bullshit you've said before but the thing is that when my parents divorced, my dad got me. So no, you assumptive, arrogant, ignorant failed abortion.

No, you are weaker than me because you allow your feeble mind to fall into submission to the idea that men control sex. If you were half as strong as me, then you could have sex without allowing it to be such. But you're mentally feeble.
If surrendering to primitive desires makes me weak, then you are far more weaker than I because you allow yourself to surrender to the primitive desire of leisure. Leisure does far less good than sex. Sex is necessary for the survival of the human kind, especially because sex strengthens bonds between partners which is needed to increase the likeliness of their offspring surviving.
It's a fact, recently studied, that females from the primitive eras would actually sleep around because if the males didn't know who exactly the father was, they were more likely to be involved in raising the child and less likely to kill it because it could be theirs.
http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2000/sep/03/anthonybrowne.theobserver
But I'm sure you won't read that because it would prove you wrong and because you're too ignorant to understand what any of it means.

Yet you are too weak to allow yourself to have sex without letting it be shameful and demeaning.

That must be the case in your country because in the states, it's men who are shamed for being virgins and are in fact encouraged to sleep around. It's women who are shamed for being non-virgins and for sleeping around. Your country is backwards as hell.

For you, yeah. You have no self control so I can see why you think this would be a problem. I have no problem resisting sex. My boyfriend wants it way more often than I do but I have no problem with ignoring his desire for whatever reason I may have, usually because I just don't feel like it.
Just because you have no self control, doesn't mean other women don't.

And why do you think they need to be self cleaning? Because they attract and hold bacteria. LOGIC. Use it.
If a mans wanker were nearly as filthy as our pussies, they too would have a self cleaning mechanism, but don't!
Stick up disgustingly lmao
I love how this asexual is trying to shame the heteros and whoever else about their biology.

Don't lie, that's such a typical female trait.

What? You'd come over and beat us up? Yeah, you do that sweetheart. Let's see how well a puny bigot like you will do against any one of us. Especially considering 'you're legally blind'.

NOPE Because every single time your mom had sex, it didn't result in a pregancy and it wasn't to make babies. Not unless your mom is just as much as a bigot as you as well as a bible thumper.
No wonder your views are so distorted, she smeared hers off on you.

You see, if you knew shit about BigBangTheory, you'd know that the first episode she was even in, the whole point of her existence was to prove that there was a female counterpart to Sheldon and the point of making her female was to make her a love-interest for him or else she would have been male.

Believing in how the show was written by it's writers doesn't make me a fan-nazi nor does it mean I enjoy the show any less.
If anything, I'm more of a fan than you because I believe the fans are how they are because that's how the writers intended them to be, unlike you. You don't think the writers and characters are good enough because they don't follow your values.

You should have pulled out the dictionary before, hon.

That's what all internet tough guys say. You could try and throw a punch but I guarantee you, you wouldn't land it. You only landed that punch because that idiot didn't expect a wimpy tart to actually throw a fit and hit somebody over something so trivial.
In an instance in which punches were expected, you wouldn't fare half as well.

I know you're lying because she *does* discuss that topic. That's the first video of hers that I watched. She discussed that happening to the chick from Starfox. Go watch it.

Again, allow me to point you to where you called men lusty, raping pigs. You have no room to talk about men being discriminated against when you do it yourself.

How about I just look at your citations because that all sounds like a bunch of bullshit.
But of course I won't get those citations because you're making shit up. You'll just ignore my request.

I don't recall seeing anything where it's shameful for that character to receive help from a female character.
List me books or movies or games where this happens.

TL;DR

You =/= All women so quit bitching and ranting about how women are sluts for now following your personal values.
Get over the fact that it's perfectly natural and it is intended for humans to have casual and recreational sex.

Have some sources, you dumbfuck.

http://www.theguardian.com/uk/2000/sep/03/anthonybrowne.theobserver

http://womanforwomen.wordpress.com/2011/12/27/feminist-view-on-sex/

http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/feminism-gender/

Wait she quoted Andrea Dworkin? That obesse man hatin hippy?



Your hero in a nutshell!
What I dont get is why extreme feminist are more filthy looking than men? As a proud BACON againts man oppression, or depression that she couldn't get man juice inside of her? I guess she's eating too many scoop of ice cream and cake to sooth her crying every night.

I went and read her journals, every single one of them because I'm an idiot and look at what I've found from them:



So in 2011 she was eighteen years old, so she shall be 21 on September 1, 2013.

I highlighted the second line because it reminded me of my friend from high school. Her family was ultra religious and ultra strict. How strict might you ask? Their kids were not allowed to watch PG-13 at age 16. I'll repeat, they were not allowed to watch. a. PG-13. movie. AT. AGE. 16! My first R film was when I was 6; it was Backdraft, because my father was a firefighter and wanted to let us know what it was like to be a firefighter and what could possibly happen to him. My point? Later on when my friend went to college she went WILD. She no longer had mommy and daddy to tell her what she could or couldn't do. I won't go into details what happened but it wasn't pretty.

That's how our friend is. She's been sheltered her whole life and hasn't done anything nuts...hasn't grown a little so maybe this is her 'wild' state. Going on sites that mummy wouldn't let her go on before. Such a rebel.



It's because you're a moron sweetie. You don't listen to anybody so how are you supposed to learn?

Sorry, but this next one is cut in two, but it has it's moments:





Just let those sink in for a minute.

The last one is the best one, I believe I've found why she doesn't like men or their es:

http://naokoelric2250.deviantart.com/journal/ANOTHER-QUESTION-THING-362318837



SHE'S GAY!!!1one Or at least bi.

Here's a link to her best friend as well, maybe we can ask him what her true last name is?

http://maximothe1.deviantart.com/

Isn't Dworkin the one who endorsed incest and said it should be legal to fuck your parents?

I'm pretty sure these days its men submitting to women FOR sex, not women submitting to men in sex. Going into this without reading much about this loony I'm going to assume there have been some daddy issues. Maybe some grandaddy touching issues...either way this fear of is unnatural. I also noticed shes one of those stupid kind of religious people, who pick the parts that correspond with what their mental illness thinks. FYI, that same book tells me your worth 50 sheckels, not 50 years. Though to be honest I wouldn't of even needed to have skimmed one of those links too know your a religious nut, because your "I'm right, your wrong" personality fits the stereotype all too well. And while I could understand not wanting to be "deflowered" until you find that special someone, your a moron if you think any women who acts otherwise is a slut, in fact that's down right ignorant. Ultimately I assume your mother must of had a little fling with daddy, had a happy little accident, and he probably skedaddled out of there... are you perhaps a springtime baby? would make a lot of sense if you were a product of summer lovin..

Anyways, I'm sure its been said many times already but you really should see a counselor to seek help, what you're displaying is rather absurd and I feel you will most likely die afraid and alone if you continue down this course. of course you will most likely reject everything being said, as with most mental illnesses, the victim of said illness usually believes they are the normals ones, and refuse potentially life saving treatment...just taking a high school psychology course will teach you that

You never said you were always right...you just keep arguing your position every time someone points out the insurmountable flaws in your 'logic'. Also, most people who speak as an authority on a given subject actually READ and RESEARCH various opinions and experts in that field before climbing on a soapbox. You know, having actual evidence and well established reasoning to back them up, rather than just spouting garbled nonsense like a fool.

Lol there are two main ways people can gain knowledge; through experience/self learning, and through academic institutions. You've demonstrated plainly that you lack the first. I'm going to go out on a limb and assume you don't have anything worth bragging about for the second.

I'm certain your physical strength matches your mental strength...so I'm not too worried.

The average cost to raise a child to the age of 18 has got to be somewhere around 200k USD these days, so......your skank mom had one child and instead of spending the 50 bucks or whatever to get a marriage license, she just decided to have some more sex and make another bastard. Sounds about as logical as could reasonably be expected for anyone related to you.

Yeah, I understand. I've never been with anyone as well, (some of it is religious upbringing but most of it is from the fear of STD's that were implanted in me in seeing a man and a woman with severe herpes on their eyes and mouth in elementary school.) but I don't go around judging people for having sex if they want it. Just because I choose to not have sex doesn't mean that others can't make the same choice.

The only thing I hope that they do is practice safe sex.

Remember: wrap it up before you tap it up.