I Need Feminism

that's a pretty accurate description of every gurl gamhurr

I assumed she drew it because it was the thing that most resembled the crabs that are crawling around in her unkempt pubes.

That's also acceptable. I guess we'll never really know.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/apr/14/kirsten-dunst-sparks-feminist-ire-you-need-man-be-/

How dare she express a personal preference different from the majority's? Her words have sent us all back to 50,000BC! Hey, look! We've just discovered the wheel. It's all downhill from here. Literally.

Hey guys to stop the patriarchy from controlling us! lets not get angry at the fact that Britain has passed bills that allow sharia law guide lines when it comes to inheritance http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/03/23/sharia-law-enshrined-in-uk-legal-system_n_5016396.html or the fact that there is an over abundance of Female Genital Mutilation in Britain; nahhh lets fucking complain about Samus in High heels. FOR EQUALITY!

The funniest thing about tumblr feminism is that one time i came across this post that was directed at "egalitarians" that was along the lines of

"BAWWWW THERE ARE ENSLAVED YOUNG GIRLS IN AFRICA AND THEY NEED OUR VOICE
AND YOU AREN'T A FEMINIST SO UR AGAINST THEM BAAAWWWWW11111111!!!"

waitwaithold up...
they say that they don't want none of your manipulative bullshit and NOW you actually give a FUCK about the goddamn AFRICANS?

Because what else to expect from a movement that only cares when it makes them look right.
Get the hell out of my face.

There's that word again. "Limit".

What the fuck did I just read?

Is this one of those chicks who's eating her own tampons?

Or is she simply lacking empathy and not understanding most people prefer not to suck on genitals that went unwashed for a couple of days, let alone ones that ooze drying blood and clots and uterus lining?

...

It's both isn't it?

Maybe she just recently read 50 shade of grey.

I think it could be back from the hunter/gatherers days.
Females can potentially become mothers, and it's more convenient to let them stay safe, I guess.
Losing a child is a loss. Emotional factor aside, it's a waste of time and energies that both parents have spent.

Which is why men were the hunters and females were the gatherers.
Males could go hunting potentially dangerous animals and take more risks, since they don't have to bear the child/children in their womb, and if they die...welp, at least they fucked and got someone pregnant with their child/children.

I guess the same could be applied to military careers when our ancestor started living in cities.

Call me out if I said some bullshit, guys.

Out.

The paradox of declining women happyness

Good.

Why? Correct me.

The problem is that women are physically and mentally lazy due to them not being held to the same standards as men.

Or maybe its just because men simply have the naturally stronger body?

Which standards are we talking about, exactly?

True,though I was thinking more about taking risks than being strong.

Well, for one thing, not lowering requirements for physical aptitude. This is usually done for quotas but is really the height of idiocy since jobs that have physical standards cannot afford to lower physical standards. If you're going to have quotas then fill the low income jobs (or jobs that don't require higher education) first. The removal of sex segregation when it comes to crisis/help centres. The removal of any and all legal advantages for either gender. The introduction and equalisation of mandatory sentencing. The abolition of all discrimination laws as they're never applied equally.

That's is from purely bureaucratic point of view. Many think the problem is social so, you know, shun women in the exact same way men are shunned. A shame society is a healthy society. For instance, we should shun both men and women for wearing revealing clothes and pass judgement accordingly because only trashy individuals wear revealing clothes in public. Let's be honest, nobody wants to see Human garbage when they're going down to the shops. If you want to live like that then fuck off to San Francisco. Women should be shunned for not having a job and a husband in the same way men are shunned for not having a job and a wife. I can't think of any more that can be universally applied. Oh! I guess women shouldn't be allowed to wear high heeled shoes or make-up? Maybe? There shouldn't be any taboos about beating a woman. At least not more so than beating men.

Social problems are subjective. I prefer bureaucratic initiatives. Much easier to think about.