You know, if you did do that - the admins would catch word of it and you would possibly get in trouble for it.
Oh well, suit yourself. I assume you wouldn't even care even if they actually managed to track down your IP address and hack the ED wiki in order to close it down.
There's already a deviantart user called Anonymoose. And do you even know who is Anonymous in the first place?
This just in, Shitbread can't keep a single line of reasoning straight or understand blatant sarcasm, as usual Film and quadruple posts at 11
Do you have any idea how many failed attempts there have been ? I dont know the exact number , but its a fuck ton.
Damn ShitBread I heard you were dumb, but I didn't expect the levels to stupidity to look any smarter.
Our lovely oldfag did it again http://butthurtbrigade.deviantart.com/art/Hark-the-faggot-sings-282065774
"I've seen in journals of former CVs about x being the last DD they handed out, and how "fitting" it is; but, this is the first time I've seen it in a DD description. It's downright insulting to the artist. It's the Kanye of DD descriptions." `timmy64 Let's take a look at what DD's have now become. Used to be a time these mattered. And that they showcased top notch mindblowing art. Or at least attempted to do that. Not going to link to the piece in question because the artist doesn't deserve to keep getting slammed over it. Besides apparently you can say what you want about any piece of art on the site but if you talk shit on a DD you can get banned. And well, I've had a few ban threats based on policy I hadn't actually violated, so I won't actually violate one of the most idiotic policies around. Besides, the art shown is not the issue. The art is fine. But not the issue. The issue is this horrific DD 'description.' It's not even a fucking description. Eeek. Can I just say eeek? It's a swan song for someone who is (thankfully) leaving this mortal coil of volunteers. It refers to dArama. WTF does that have to do with the art featured? Why should anything picked for a DD have that stigma attached to it? More good times than bad? How does this pertain to the art featured? (If she had said she's posted more bad DD's than good it would have made sense) The rest sounds like some opium inspired babble about the majestic and wondrous times spent serving the community and friends and fucking mice running about your feet singing Cindarelly Cindarelly! This...this is not fucking description of a piece of art. This is a journal entry. Hell it's barely that. It's a shitty facebook status update for fucks sake. If I were the artist who got featured I would be appalled to see someone use my art as a platform to sing their swan song to the public. I'd fucking toss the image in storage and contact the +helpless desk and demand that be removed. You wanna sing your goofy swan song, sing it on your own art. Give yourself a fucking DD and sing it. And this raises the question? Who is babysitting the babysitters? Are these descriptions not reviewed? You can't tell me there is no time to do this. They are posted ahead of time. Takes whatever drunken blind person in charge (I honestly don't even know who is overseeing these people anymore or if anyone even is) to go 'okay wait, this is no good, lemme delete this description and let them know why.' Daily Deviations have hit an all new low. Allowing them to be used as a farewell note is just...lmao what a fucking joke. You might as well start spamming fucking devWear ads in the descriptions. I can see through the mist to the magic, and the magic is just code for bullshit and artistic delinquency. dA fucking get ahold of your fucking selves and put some fucking pride and control in the work that gets the highest notice on this site.
