Apparently, DA decided to post this in all its users inboxes today. http://hq.deviantart.com/blog/45688...&utm_campaign=110111_NET_Nudes&utm_term=title I haven't got the gist of what they're blabbering about, but by the looks of it, they're finally super butthurt about all the porn artistic nudity on their site and I think they're trying to defend themselves about it. Your thoughts, people?
Wrong subforum. And they stick up and will always stick up with the jewgolds, even if they come from shitty webcam n00dz.
Well, at least it's in the right subforum now and I realized my mistake before anyone else said so, but that isn't saying much and I bet nobody cares regardless. Seeing how the DA admins act a lot like their more drama sensitive users, there's no wonder why the site is Bawwville USA and only a handful of sane people try to make a difference.
There's a line between tasteful and straight up desperate_camwhore_pussy_closeup.jpg Lots of stuff of the latter being reported, and somehow the exhibitionists are butthurt about censorship and shit when their stuff gets hate (and/or removed). So this article is a sugar-coated piece on "Please, no more shriveled dick pics"
While I find the word 'artistic' really going against the grain of anything DA shits out recently, I find the number of shitty naked camwhores against people trying to do real nude photography is astounding and they should just get rid of the nudes entirely. Even stock nude shots are usually some fat cunt in fishnets spreading her pussy for the webcam, and how the fuck are you supposed so use that for anything you're drawing?
Yeah, the quality of artistic nudes is appalling. I've only found a handful of good stock artists who have great poses, lighting and high quality shots. A lot of reference on DA are crap because half of these chicks don't bother looking into lighting and getting a good camera, much less imitating classical poses or foreshortening or whatever would be useful to artists. Closeups of your junk? That's a great reference! No, I didn't read the article because it sounded dumb to me, and they wanted me to join into the discussion haha. No thanks.
